Overlooking Legal Checks on New Brand Elements

The Dfinity vs. Meta Case Study

Ben Mukoma

7/5/20242 min read

Rebranding is a quick fix?

The rebranding process is fraught with challenges that can extend beyond design and strategy into the complex realm of legal compliance. A crucial step often overlooked by many businesses during rebranding is the legal examination of new brand elements. The Dfinity vs. Meta lawsuit serves as a stark reminder of the potential legal pitfalls and the necessity of thorough legal checks.

Understanding the Importance of Legal Checks

Legal due diligence is critical when introducing new brand elements such as logos, taglines, and overall visual identity. This process ensures that these elements do not infringe upon existing trademarks and are free from potential legal disputes. It also secures the brand's unique elements, protecting them from potential misuse.

Case Study: Dfinity vs. Meta Platforms Inc.

In a notable legal battle, Dfinity, a nonprofit blockchain developer, sued Meta Platforms Inc., alleging that Meta’s new logo, introduced during its rebrand from Facebook, resembled Dfinity's infinity-symbol logo. Dfinity claimed this similarity could cause confusion among consumers, potentially associating Dfinity with Meta's controversial history regarding user privacy. Dfinity, which focuses on creating a blockchain platform to challenge big tech's control over user data, registered its logo trademark in 2018, two years after its establishment.

Meta described its logo as a "continuous loop" resembling an infinity sign, intended to symbolize "infinite horizons in the metaverse." The legal conflict highlighted the risks of brand confusion in sectors where both entities operate—technology and digital platforms.

Legal Implications and Outcome

The lawsuit emphasized the importance of conducting extensive trademark searches and securing intellectual property rights before launching new brand elements. Dfinity’s proactive registration of their logo as a trademark played a crucial role in their legal standing, although the court initially found Meta's logo unlikely to cause consumer confusion, highlighting differences in design and target audience.

Ultimately, the case was settled with the parties asking the court to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be revived. This resolution underscores the potential financial and reputational costs involved in such legal disputes.

Proactive Steps for Legal Safety in Rebranding
  • Conduct Thorough Trademark Searches: Before finalizing any new brand elements, conduct comprehensive searches to ensure no existing trademarks could be infringed upon.

  • Engage Intellectual Property Attorneys: Early involvement of IP attorneys can guide the creative process within legal boundaries, reducing risks of future legal challenges.

  • Understand the Broader Legal Context: Be aware of the legal standards in all markets where the brand will be present, not just your local jurisdiction.

  • Prepare for Financial Implications: Recognize the potential costs of legal disputes. Most small to mid-sized businesses do not have the resources to engage in prolonged legal battles with large corporations.

Conclusion

The case of Dfinity vs. Meta highlights the critical importance of integrating legal checks into the rebranding process. It serves as a cautionary tale that skipping this step can lead to significant legal challenges, potentially derailing the rebranding efforts and causing substantial financial strain. Businesses must prioritize legal due diligence to safeguard their rebranding initiatives and ensure their new brand elements stand on solid legal ground.

We simplify brand building for those starting, growing, or changing direction.

You will receive all our key articles straight to your email, once a week.

Recent thinking